Sunday, October 25, 2009
WHO CARES ABOUT "NAZIS" OR WHITE SUPREMACISTS ANYWAY THEY'RE NOT ON MY MIND UNLESS THEY AFFECT ME, FRIENDS, OR FAMILY. TOO MUCH MORE IMPORTANT STUFF TO WORRY ABOUT. THEY AINT BOUT NOTHIN ANYWAY.
And i just have a feeling this isn't a REAL protest. Like one side is being funded to cause problems with the other to hype up this race tension.
If you like this post, consider subscribing to my full feed RSS.
Here´s my point with regard to Obama being a "milestone" and how deceptive that was. See John Pilger, Alex Jones, Greg Palastand Sean Wilentz for even more detail. Anybody of any ethnic grou
who can´t even see this when quite possibly by Exectuve Order Obama could MANDATE both H1N1 vaccines (which we know now causes Swine Flu and reduces T-cells effectively causing cancer, is deluded by an image that is DANGEROUS and very much NOT a role-model.
Let me clear up any confusion.
Del Valle was the first and only Jewish president of Panama. Joe Lieberman was the first Jewish person to be on a major party ticket. Both mediocreties. Obama is mediocre to bad as he does the bidding of the 20 largest banks, the insurance lobby, big pharma who can´t get rid of all that thimerosol after the consert decree, and of course the military contractor and private prisons.
But, OK, let´s grant that it was important to support an African-American candidate because of the systemic racism in American culture to the point of a holocaust when you conisder the evil of privatized prison and NoChildLeftBehind.... Read More
What the hell was wrong with Cynthia McKinney on the Green Party ticket thent? She had a veteran Democratic front-bencher until she ran afould of AIPAC. They sent out the useless Majette to beat McKinney in the primariy a few years ago, but McKinney fought her way back into the seat where she cast only anti-war, pro-people, votes over and over again. Her warchest for 2006 just wasnt big enough to fend of the AIPAC supported Johnson.
A McKinney presi dency would have featured NO WARS, NO PROXY CIVIL WARS, NO COERCIVE USA MILITARY BASES, A FAR MORE "CONSERVATIVE" APPROACH TO FISCAL POLICY AND NO GODDAMED GIVEAWAYS TO WALL STREET BILLIONAIRES.
So, why was OBAMA the "milestone" candidate instead of McKINNEY? Because Obama raised more money from MALIGN Wall Street and polluting industrial sources than McKINNEY ever could.
More´s the pity.
I just realized how bad ass those folks on bikes are with their 1,000 pounds of machinery to run over anyone with. And even without, it looked like a large gathering of ex wrestlers taking on the little brown man.
Something tells me that fighting them this way is senseless and worthless. The cops, even when caught red-handed abusing people, simply spend the bucks to cover the offenders and generally get lenient sentences or nothing in retribution.
The answer must be in lawsuits or legal action. But, one must have Big Bucks to fight that battle (and time).
I have neither, so anger and frustration ensue (and I would imagine is a large part of the crowd's fire).
I am not sure I get the neo nazi part, tho.
Like you Buelahman I supported Kucinich out the box, McKinney was my second choice and her public service experience and record were a helluva lot more appealling than Obama's. Most people don't research candidates as they should instead they sit in front of the TV and wait to see who the networks are going to find worthy of adolation. I just recently had a conversation in a cafe where people were saying voting for someone on an alternative was wasted vote. It as if most people walk around with transistors up their ass.
*oh snaps, I'm off topic, my apology*
To me there were 4 excellent candidates in that race, none of them named Obama, Clinton, Biden or McCain.
With the full fields, I liked in order;
(1) KUCINICH
(2) PAUL
With field reduced I liked
(1) PAUL
(2) CLINTON
(3) OBAMA
(4) ROMNEY
IN GENERAL:
(1) I invented OBAMA and I hate myself for it having written an editorial in June endorsing McKINNEY
(2) McKINNEY
(3) NADER
Going forward I hope Kucinich runs against Obama and Paul runs for Repulican nomination. Truth is, I´m more into these new model Repubicans than Paul even: PETER SCHIFF for CT SENATE, TOM CAMPBELL for CA governor, ADAM KOKESH for House in New Mexico and VALERIE SARGENT MEYERS for House from Macon, GA.
Something is telling me that Wexler IS going to run for president, too, and while there´s stuff I like about him and stuff I don´t, I think he may really be too unstable for the job. I´m sorry he left the House. For most of his years in the House he was smart and lively (and crazy).
The guy defended Colombian drug cases in Florida in the 80s, you mean he´s so dazzled by Obama´s bullshit that he had to be OBAMA´s first supporter in Congress? Was he so naive as to believe he´d be a trusted advisor of Obama´s after he and Kucinich read articles of impeachment against Bush and Cheney into the record? That he cross examined Rice so hard she almost cried? That his being a writer of anti-UIGEA legislatiion along with PAUL-FRANK-SANCHEZ-PORTER (Frank and 3 libertarians?) That he´d tell a joke on national tv about doing coke and fucking strippers? IF AL FRANKEN DID THAT IT WOULD BE HIS "OUTRAGEOUS" SENSE OF HUMOR? With Wexler YOU FUCKIN KNOW ITS TRUE!
Take a good look at the guy. I don´t like ethnic profiling but I "grew up" with guys like Wexler!
He sure would be worth a laugh or two if nohting else, but he´d fuck Kucinich´s thing all to hell which would be terrible.
With a gun to my head,I think Obama is going to be re-elected by a slim margin over Mittens.
"TOM CAMPBELL for CA governor, ADAM KOKESH for House in New Mexico and VALERIE SARGENT MEYERS for House from Macon, GA."
Never heard of em but will find out about them. Don't know Wexler either. Is Romney really running against Obama???? Fuck that i wouldn't vote for none of them and if I could vote and did vote it would be for Obama if those were the only 2 options. Hopefully Paul and Kucinich run.